Social media buys time for CMOs?

The average tenure of the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) has been declining for years and up until recently was showing an average 22 months.  Now there is circumstantial evidence that social media may be the turnaround tool needed to provide more CMO stability.

The CMO position holds primary responsibility for revenue,  therefore it’s commonly held that the CMO is the first sacrifice when shareholders want to punish poor returns.   But this belief is like a red herring to the back story highlighted by Ad Age’s Paul Dunay as he discusses the tenure challenge.

Dunary identifies that much of the problem is the inability to get timely feedback on deployed marketing efforts.  The need for timely research feedback that allows for tweaking and retweaking has long thwarted even the best marketers.

Enter social media.  And enter an uptick in CMO tenure.  Dunay identifies an upward CMO tenure trend reflected in a recent SpencerStuart study pegging the average time to 28 months.  A jump from 22 to 28 months! Coincidence? I think not!

Allison Fine on the HBR blog  notes that “According to a Booz & Company/Buddy Media survey released last October of more than 100 large companies, only a third have a senior executive charged with overseeing social media. And just over a third (38%) reported social media as a CEO-level agenda item.”  It may be that 1/3 represents the tipping point for CMO longevity.  The ability to participate in an immediate conversation with consumers in a 24/7 social media world provides much-needed timely feedback that allows for marketing strategy adjustment.

Although social media is still struggling against the boardroom “bah humbugs” – it is clearly growing in respect.  And along with it, CMO tenure.

Entertainment, Media and Ad Biz Grow

Entertainment, Media and Ad Biz Grow Ad Age reports 8.8% growth in 2010 for the leading national advertisers.   That growth marks the highest spending increase in six years. PricewaterhouseCooper’s global entertainment and media forecast predicts 5.7 percent compound annual rate growth through to 2015. Meteoric numbers compared to the usual glum economic indicators of consumer spending, unemployment rate and retail sales.

So why, with all the gloom and doom of economic forecasting, does the intersect of Hollywood and Vine looks so good?  It looks like product manufacturers understand the need for advertising in a slow market and recognize that entertainment and media provide the tools for getting their word out.

The winners for the entertainment gains are all things film related: TV (both advertising +4.9% and subscription/license fees +5.6%) , filmed entertainment +5.4%, and video games +4/6%.  Interestingly enough recorded music is the only category that was forecast negative growth -.4%.   Even the music category may be a surprise given the recent Nielsen report putting music sales up year to date in 2011.   Music sales are up over 8% overall compared to 2010 with of course digital music leading the growth at 19%.

In The Hollywood Report  article on the forecast, Stefanie Kane of PricewaterhouseCooper says “The global economy started recovering perhaps earlier in 2010 than we thought, and advertising has bounced back”. The battle for consumer’s attention is being fought on the frontline of entertainment and media.  As unlikely as it might seem – entertainment and media may indeed be the front line indicator of overall economic growth.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.